The 20 year evolution of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Over the past 20 years, investigators world-wide have developed and utilized dobutamine magnetic resonance stress testing procedures for the purpose of identifying ischemia, viability, and cardiac prognosis. This article traces these developments and reviews the data utilized to substantiate this relatively new noninvasive imaging procedure

Review of journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2010

There were 75 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2010, which is a 34% increase in the number of articles since 2009. The quality of the submissions continues to increase, and the editors were delighted with the recent announcement of the JCMR Impact Factor of 4.33 which showed a 90% increase since last year. Our acceptance rate is approximately 30%, but has been falling as the number of articles being submitted has been increasing. In accordance with Open-Access publishing, the JCMR articles go on-line as they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. Last year for the first time, the Editors summarized the papers for the readership into broad areas of interest or theme, which we felt would be useful to practitioners of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) so that you could review areas of interest from the previous year in a single article in relation to each other and other recent JCMR articles [1]. This experiment proved very popular with a very high rate of downloading, and therefore we intend to continue this review annually. The papers are presented in themes and comparison is drawn with previously published JCMR papers to identify the continuity of thought and publication in the journal. We hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your quality manuscripts to JCMR for publication

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in systemic hypertension

Systemic hypertension is a highly prevalent potentially modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of underlying causes for hypertension, in assessing cardiovascular complications of hypertension, and in understanding the pathophysiology of the disease process. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides accurate and reproducible measures of ventricular volumes, mass, function and haemodynamics as well as uniquely allowing tissue characterization of diffuse and focal fibrosis. In addition, CMR is well suited for exclusion of common secondary causes for hypertension. We review the current and emerging clinical and research applications of CMR in hypertension

Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart Disease

AbstractIschemic heart disease is a complex disease process caused by the development of coronary atherosclerosis, with downstream effects on the left ventricular myocardium. It is characterized by a long preclinical phase, abrupt development of myocardial infarction, and more chronic disease states such as stable angina and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Recent advances in computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) now allow detailed imaging of each of these different phases of the disease, potentially allowing ischemic heart disease to be tracked during a patient’s lifetime. In particular, CT has emerged as the noninvasive modality of choice for imaging the coronary arteries, whereas CMR offers detailed assessments of myocardial perfusion, viability, and function. The clinical utility of these techniques is increasingly being supported by robust randomized controlled trial data, although the widespread adoption of cardiac CT and CMR will require further evidence of clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness

Impaired left ventricular stroke volume reserve during clinical dobutamine stress predicts future episodes of pulmonary edema.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether dobutamine-induced abnormal stress changes in left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) and aortic stiffness predict future pulmonary edema. BACKGROUND: Increased aortic stiffness that decreases LVSV during adrenergic stress may serve as a marker for future pulmonary edema (PE). METHODS: We measured LVSV, ventriculovascular stiffness (pulse pressure/LVSV(index)), and aortic distensibility at rest and during intravenous dobutamine administration using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Personnel blinded to dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance followed participants longitudinally over time to identify those admitted to the hospital with PE. Data for 44 participants who had a hospital admission for PE were compared with data for 72 participants of similar age, sex, and resting left ventricular ejection fraction who remained PE free. RESULTS: Expressed as median and interquartile range, participants with and without PE exhibited a decreased stress/rest LVSV ratio (0.9 [range 0.7 to 1.1] vs. 1.0 [range 0.9 to 1.2], respectively; p = 0.002), an increased ventriculovascular stiffness stress/rest ratio (1.4 [range 1.0 to 1.6] vs. 1.0 [range 0.8 to 1.3], respectively; p ≤ 0.001); and a decreased stress-induced measure of aortic distensibility (0.8 mm Hg(-3) [range 0.3 to 1.3 mm Hg(-3)] vs. 1.6 mm Hg(-3) [range 1.2 to 3.2 mm Hg(-3)], respectively; p = 0.002). After accounting for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, risk factors for PE, and the presence of dobutamine-induced ischemia, LVSV reserve and the stress/rest ventriculovascular stiffness ratio still differed (p < 0.008 for both) in those with and without PE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients without inducible ischemia during dobutamine stress testing in whom one might otherwise assume a favorable prognosis, the failure to increase LVSV or an increase in ventriculovascular stiffness indicates patients at risk of subsequent PE